The 2026 tax changes didn’t just tweak charitable giving rules — they fundamentally changed how corporate philanthropy should be evaluated.
For CFOs, the new reality is simple but consequential:
- Corporate charitable deductions now have a 1% floor
- The existing 10% ceiling still applies
- Giving below 1% is generally nondeductible
- Giving above 1% can be partially deductible
This short guide lays out a clear, practical framework CFOs can use to decide how (and whether) to structure corporate giving in 2026.
No jargon. No fluff. Just decisions.
Step 1: Identify Your Corporate Tax Position
Before talking about CSR strategy, answer one question:
Are we a C-Corporation or a pass-through entity?
- C-Corporation
This framework applies directly. The 1% floor and 10% ceiling matter. - Pass-through (LLC, S-Corp, partnership)
Corporate-level deductions don’t apply the same way. Giving flows to owners and is handled under individual tax rules instead.
If you’re a C-Corp, continue below.
Step 2: Calculate Your 1% Floor
This is now the most important number in corporate philanthropy.
1% floor = 1% of projected taxable income
Examples:
- $10M taxable income → $100,000 floor
- $50M taxable income → $500,000 floor
- $100M taxable income → $1,000,000 floor
Any charitable giving below this number is generally nondeductible.
Any giving above this number may be deductible, up to the 10% ceiling.
Step 3: Choose One of Three Giving Strategies
Every C-Corp will now fall into one of three rational strategies. None are “wrong.” What matters is being intentional.
Option 1: Give Below 1% (Engagement-First Strategy)
When this makes sense:
- Giving is primarily about culture, values, or employer brand
- Tax efficiency is not a priority
- Budgets are intentionally modest or fixed
- Leadership prefers flexibility over tax optimization
What this means:
- Charitable giving is treated as a nondeductible expense
- Focus is on employee engagement, volunteering, and visibility
- CFOs should stop evaluating giving as a tax strategy
Best tools to support this approach:
- Automated employee matching
- Volunteer rewards (Dollars for Doers)
- Campaign-based giving
Platforms like Percent Pledge’s Giving Platform make this easy to manage while keeping Finance out of day-to-day administration.
Option 2: Give Between 1% and 10% (Deductibility Strategy)
When this makes sense:
- The company already gives near or above the 1% threshold
- Leadership values tax efficiency
- CSR and Finance are aligned
- Giving can be planned and budgeted annually
What this means:
- Only the portion above 1% is deductible
- The deduction is capped at 10% of taxable income
- Giving should be structured and centralized
Most effective tactics:
- Corporate grants
- Structured matching gift programs
- Intentional “bunched” giving in certain years
This is where centralized tools for grants, matching gifts, nonprofit vetting, and reporting become essential for Finance.
Option 3: Hybrid Strategy (Most Common for Mid-Market Companies)
When this makes sense:
- The company wants employee engagement and tax efficiency
- CSR and HR want flexibility
- Finance wants predictability and control
What this means:
- Use matching gifts and employee programs to drive engagement
- Use corporate grants to intentionally cross the 1% floor
- Treat deductibility as a design feature, not an accident
This approach is increasingly common because it balances:
- Culture
- Impact
- Budgeting
- Tax outcomes
Step 4: Decide How to Allocate Giving Dollars
Once a strategy is chosen, CFOs should think in buckets — not one-off donations.
Common allocation mix:
- Corporate grants (predictable, deductible)
- Matching gifts (engaging, capped, deductible)
- Volunteer rewards / Cause Credits (culture-focused, deductible)
- Campaign-based giving (engagement-driven)
All of these count toward corporate charitable contributions when structured properly.
Step 5: Know When Carryforwards Matter (and When They Don’t)
- Contributions above the 10% ceiling can be carried forward for up to five years
- Contributions below the 1% floor generally cannot
- Timing matters more now:
- Some companies may accelerate giving into 2025
- Others may “bunch” giving into a single year to exceed the floor
This is a Finance-led decision that should be discussed early in annual planning.
A Simple CFO Summary
If you want the one-paragraph takeaway:
“In 2026, corporate giving below 1% of taxable income is generally nondeductible. Giving above 1% can be partially deductible up to 10%. That means we should either treat philanthropy as a nondeductible engagement investment or intentionally structure giving to exceed the threshold. Matching gifts and corporate grants are the cleanest ways to do that. The key is choosing a strategy — not drifting into one.”
Why This Matters for HR and CSR Leaders
HR and CSR teams don’t need to become tax experts — but they do need a framework Finance respects.
This decision model:
- Creates a shared language with CFOs
- Avoids misaligned expectations
- Makes budget conversations faster and more productive
When everyone agrees on the strategy, execution becomes much easier.
Final Thought
The 2026 tax changes don’t tell companies how much to give — they force companies to be intentional.
That’s good for Finance.
It’s good for CSR.
And it’s good for the nonprofits that depend on predictable, well-structured support.
If you want help translating this framework into a giving program that actually works in practice, we’d be glad to help. Book time with our experts.
