The number one reason companies stay on a CSR platform they've outgrown is fear of losing their data.
Years of giving history. Volunteer hours people logged. Matching records. The worry is simple and real. If we switch, do our employees log in to a blank slate? Does all of that just disappear?
It doesn't have to. Here's exactly what happens to your data in a well-run switch, step by step, so the fear stops being a reason to stay.
What data you actually have
First, know what's on the table. A CSR platform holds a few kinds of records.
Giving history. Every donation an employee has made through the platform.
Volunteer hours. What people logged, for which causes, over time.
Matching records. What the company matched, and against which gifts.
Employee accounts. Who's enrolled, their preferences, their causes.
Nonprofit and cause lists. The organizations your program supports.
All of it has value. Giving history is someone's personal record of their generosity. Matching data is a financial record. Volunteer hours may feed a benefit like VTO. Losing any of it is a real cost, which is why the fear is reasonable.
What migrates
Here's the short answer. In a proper migration, all of it moves.
Giving history carries over. Volunteer hours carry over. Matching records carry over. Employee accounts and their causes come with them. Your nonprofit lists move too.
The goal of a migration is continuity, not a fresh start. A good provider treats your history as something to preserve, because it's what keeps your already-engaged employees engaged after the switch.
What employees actually see
This is the part that matters most to your people.
When the switch is done right, an employee logs into the new platform and their record is intact. Their past donations are there. Their volunteer hours are there. It feels like an upgrade to a tool they already used, not a reset to zero.
That continuity is what protects the heart of your program. The people who finally started giving don't lose their history or their momentum. They just get a better experience around it.
How the migration actually works
Behind the scenes, a migration is a careful, repeatable process. It usually runs in a few steps.
Export. Your data comes out of the old platform in a structured file.
Map. Each field from the old system is matched to the right field in the new one, so nothing lands in the wrong place. A donation stays a donation, a volunteer hour stays a volunteer hour.
Import. The data loads into the new platform.
Verify. Someone checks that the records came through correctly, by the numbers and by spot-checking real accounts.
A good provider also runs a dry run first. A test migration to catch any issue before the real one. By the time your employees see anything, the data has already been moved and checked once.
We walk through the whole switch, data included, in how to switch from Benevity.
What a good migration looks like versus a bad one
Not all migrations are equal, so know the difference before you sign.
A good migration is owned by the provider, tested with a dry run, verified against the source numbers, and finished before employees ever log in. You review and approve. You don't do the heavy lifting.
A bad migration hands you an export file and wishes you luck. It skips the test run, so errors show up live. It moves current accounts but drops historical giving, so employees quietly lose years of their record. The warning sign is a vendor who talks about data as your job, not theirs.
Ask which one you're getting. The answer tells you a lot about the whole relationship.
Common questions, answered
A few specific worries come up every time.
What if an employee gave for five years? That history moves with them. They log in and see all five years.
What about pledges or recurring donations in progress? A good migration carries active commitments over so they continue without a gap.
What about reporting history we use for our annual impact numbers? That comes too, so your year-over-year story stays intact.
What if the data is messy in the old system? A dry run surfaces it, and the provider cleans the mapping before the real migration. Messy data is a reason to plan, not a reason to stay.
Data is what makes a mid-year switch possible
A lot of companies think they have to wait for a contract to end or a new year to begin. They don't.
Data continuity is exactly what lets you switch mid-year without disruption. Nothing in flight is lost. A campaign running, hours being logged, matches in progress. It all carries over. The Legacy Liberator process is built around this, so the timing of your switch is your choice, not your old contract's.
Who does the work
The last fear is that the migration becomes your project. Weeks of your team wrangling spreadsheets.
It shouldn't be. On a well-run switch, a dedicated Social Impact Manager handles the migration with you. They run the export, the mapping, the import, and the checks. Your team reviews and confirms. You don't become a data-migration project manager on top of your real job.
What to confirm with any vendor
Before you switch, ask any new provider three direct questions.
Does our full giving and volunteer history migrate, or just current accounts?
Will employees see their past records when they log in?
Who runs the migration, your team or ours?
Good answers sound like continuity and support. Vague answers are a warning. The data question is the one place you don't want surprises.
The fear of losing your data is understandable. It's also solvable, and it shouldn't keep you on a platform that no longer serves you. Book a demo and we'll show you exactly how your data would move.
.png)